« Health Care Reform: It Can't Happen Soon EnoughResearch Procedure »

Education: When Did Average Become Sufficient?

09/10/09

America aspires to be the best - producing the good, the bad, and the ugly: putting a man on the moon, wars of choice, and a three-time hot dog eating-champion.

But what happened to American education being the best? One study published in the USA Today describes how students with similar admissions statistics can graduate at different rates depending on the institution.  What was the defining factor between success and failure?  Institutions that are more challenging graduate more students.

Today, the pressure is on the instructor to get kids to pass, to leave no child behind, and move everyone on to the next level. This means they have to cater to the lower end of the class, rather than to the best students.  In essence, we are trading the prospect of having better students, who are ready for the global economy, for more students who are ready for basic jobs.  We are trading efficiency for equality.

Follow up:

Imagine knowing your doctor passed anatomy with a C, or an engineer designing a high-traffic bridge, that barely passed physics, because her professor mercifully curved the grade from a failing percentage, to a passing letter grade.  Some of the students who graduate to become the people we trust with public safety are not being taught to the level of proficiency that we would expect. This trend of letting more and more students pass classes and earn degrees, without showing mastery of the topic, forces the top tier students to seek advanced degrees to set them apart.  I argue that it is this mechanism that is making the value of a college education less important every year.

Children should not be encouraged to pass -- they should be encouraged to excel.  Instructors need to teach to the top of the class, to raise the standards of education.  The United States of America can't produce the best professionals in the world with an average educational system.

3 comments

Comment from: John Rausch [Member] Email
*****
I've been saying this for quite some time. Couldn't agree more, and well put.
09/10/09 @ 18:38
Comment from: Lance Legel [Member] Email
***--
Good first article.

I think it may be unfair to "leave a child behind", and uneconomical, however.
09/10/09 @ 21:19
Comment from: David Urnes Johnson [Visitor] Email
*****
It is important to not "leave a child behind", but I think it is still possible to have an educational system where you encourage the best students to excel even more. In some classes here at UF, you can get an A without much effort. When you have a solid A already, you have no incentives to dig deeper into the material and learn more. This is unfortunate! In Norway, where I am from, the average grade is much lower, and a B is considered a very good grade. In a class of 200, there could be incidences where only 2 students get an A. By lowering the average grade, and by reevaluating what is a "good" grade, the best students will always have something to stretch for..
11/10/09 @ 17:34

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
PoorExcellent
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
The Dynamo Policy Research Group is lead by 20 students at the University of Florida who seek to impact major socioeconomic problems.

Through researched policy publications and targeted public services, we help equip and motivate systemic public action.

More about us »

Member Access